Resources

Making the Case: PICO™ Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (sNPWT) in non-healing wounds

Share this article

Making the Case: PICO™ Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (sNPWT) in non-healing wounds

20 July 2023

Non-healing wounds have been defined as those that fail to heal with standard therapy in an orderly and timely manner (Troxler et al, 2006). Nurses are repeatedly changing and dressing these wounds several times a week for months on end and, as a result, non-healing wounds are associated with considerable financial and resource burden that falls on outpatient, community and home care budgets (McCluskey et al, 2020; Hampton et al, 2022). Thirty percent of all wounds were identified as non-healing in 2017/18, and 67% of total expenditure was spent on managing these wounds (Guest et al, 2020); therefore, early identification of non-healing wounds, timely intervention and targeted use of advanced wound care products are essential to optimise future wound care services and outcomes for patients (Vowden, 2011; Guest et al, 2017). In particular, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has numerous benefits for non-healing wounds, including contraction of the wound edges to reduce wound size, volume and oedema, induced angiogenesis and granulation tissue formation, and improved tissue perfusion (WUWHS, 2018).

Disclaimer: This Making the Case guide was developed using the literature and data provided by Smith+Nephew
References

Beggs N (2018) Use of PICO sNPWT on a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) by Podiatry. Smith+Nephew

Brownhill RV, Huddleston E, Bell A et al (2021) Pre-Clinical Assessment of Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy During In Vivo Porcine Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care 10(7): 345-56

Casey C (2019) Consistent delivery of therapeutic negative pressure levels by a single use negative pressure wound therapy system (sNPWT)* in a wound model. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden

Dowsett C, Davis L, Henderson V et al (2012) The economic benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in community-based wound in the NHS. Int Wound J 9(5): 544-52

Dowsett C, Hampton J, Myers D, Styche T (2017) Use of PICO to improve clinical and economic outcomes in hard-to-heal wounds. Wounds International 8(2): 52-9

Guest JF, Vowden K, Vowden P (2017) The health economic burden that acute and chronic wounds impose on an average clinical commissioning group/health board in the UK. J Wound Care 26(6): 292-303

Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P (2020) Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ Open 10(12): 045253

Hampton J (2015) Providing cost-effective treatment of hard-to-heal wounds in the community through use of NPWT. Community Wound Care S14-S20

Hampton J, Meagher H, Sharpe A et al (2022) Multi-centre, international practice-based evidence using PICO single-use negative pressure wound therapy: challenging current behaviours in wound care practice. Wounds International 13(2): 46-53

Hughes J, Costello M, Belshaw M et al (2021) The burden of dehisced wounds in the community: using early results from a multi-centre service evaluation to propose a standard of care to improve patient outcomes and safeguard woundcare budgets. British Journal of Healthcare Management 27(1): 16-25

Hurd T, Trueman P, Rossington A (2014) Use of portable, single use negative pressure wound therapy device in home care patients with low to moderately exuding wounds: a case series. Ostomy Wound Management 60(3): 30-6

Karlakki S, Brem M, Giannini S et al (2013) Negative pressure wound therapy for management of the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery: A review of evidence and mechanisms for an emerging indication. Bone Joint Res 2(12): 276-84

Kirsner R, Cyaandi D, Reyzelamn A et al (2019a). Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and acceptance of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system versus traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of lower limb chronic ulcers (VLU and DFU). Paper presented at: EWMA; 2019; Gothenburg, Sweden

Kirsner R, Dove C, Reyzelman A (2019b) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system, compared to traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremities. Wound Repair Regen 27(5): 519-29

Malmsjö M, Huddleston E, Martin R (2014) Biological effects of a disposable, canisterless negative pressure wound therapy system. Eplasty 14: e15

McCluskey P, Brennan K, Mullan J et al (2020) Impact of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system on healing. Journal of Community Nursing 34(1): 36-43

Mcmanus H, Woodmansey E (2018) Bacterial retention within a multi-layered absorbent AIRLOCK™ Technology single use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) dressing. Paper presented at: EWMA; 2018; Krakow, Poland

Olsson M, Järbrink K, Divakar U et al (2019) The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Wound Repair Regen 27(1): 114-25

O’Toole M (2019) Use of PICO sNPWT to promote healing in leg ulcer. Smith+Nephew

Schwartz JA, Goss SG, Facchin F et al (2015) Single-use negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of chronic lower leg wounds. J Wound Care 24: S4-S9

Sharpe A, Myers D, Searle R (2018) Using single use negative pressure wound therapy for patients with complicated diabetic foot ulcers: an economic perspective. Wounds UK 14(4): 89-93

Smith+Nephew (2019) PICO Biomechanical Study. Internal Report. DS/19/211/R

Smith+Nephew (2020) What is PICO. Available at: https://www.smith-nephew.com/en/health-care-professionals/products/advanced-wound-management/pico-family#pico-features (accessed 16.06.2023)

Smith+Nephew (2021) PICO™ Pressure Mapping Study. Internal Report. DS/19/211/R – Part B

Troxler M, Vowden K, Vowden P (2006) Integrating adjunctive therapy into practice: the importance of recognising ‘hard-to-heal’ wounds. Available at: http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2006/december/Troxler/Integrating-Adjunctive-Therapy-Into-Practice.html (accessed 18.01.2023)

Vowden P (2011) Hard-to-heal wounds Made Easy. Wounds International

World Union of Wound Healing Societies (2018) Consensus document. Surgical wound dehiscence: improving prevention and outcomes. Wounds International

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.