Case series evaluation: Preserving skin integrity using the CliniMed range

Share this article

Case series evaluation: Preserving skin integrity using the CliniMed range

Supported by Clinimed
Joy Tickle, Rosie Callaghan
3 March 2020

The skin is a barrier to irritants and allergens, while also preventing water loss (Cowdell and Radley, 2012). Patients with comprised skin integrity are at increased risk of injuries such as pressure ulcers, moisture lesions, skin tears, and complications, such as infections, which can lead to pain, reduced mobility, poor quality of life, further health complications and increased healthcare costs (Moncrieff et al, 2013; Wounds UK, 2018). 

Early recognition of people who are at risk of skin damage is an essential part of prevention. Determining those at risk also aids appropriate allocation of resources (LeBlanc et al, 2018). 

​The aim of this document is to inform practitioners of the potential benefits of using medical adhesive removal and barrier products for patients with compromised skin integrity. Evidence provided in this document suggests that certain products alongside a structured skin care regimen can preserve skin integrity and avoid injury.

Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of CliniMed.

Beeckman D, Campbell J, Campbell K et al (2015) Proceedings of the Global IAD Expert Panel. Incontinence-associated dermatitis: moving prevention forward. Wounds International. Available from www.

Beeckman D (2017) A decade of research on Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis (IAD): Evidence, knowledge gaps and next steps. J Tissue Viability 26(1): 47–56

Cooper P (2010) Appeel® Sterile sachet: helps remove pain from a dressing change. Wounds UK 6(2): 100–6

Cowdell F, Radley K (2012) Maintaining skin health in older people. Nursing Times 108(49): 16–20

Dowsett D, Allen L (2013) Moisture associated skin damage made easy. Wounds UK 9(4). Available from:

Fleming L, Zala K, Ousey K (2014) Investigating the absorbency effects of LBF barrier cream. Wounds UK 10(2): 24–30

Gray M, Black JM, Baharestani MM et al (2011) Moisture-associated skin damage: overview and pathophysiology. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 38(3): 233–41

LeBlanc K, Campbell K, Beeckman D et al (2018) Best practice recommendations for the prevention and management of skin tears in aged skin.  London: Wounds International. Available from

McNichol L, Bianchi J (2016) Medical adhesive-related skin injuries (MARSI) Made Easy. London: Wounds UK. Available from

Moncrieff G, Cork M, Lawton S et al (2013) Use of emollients in dry skin conditions: consensus statement. Clin Experimental Dermatol 38(3):231-8

NHS Clinical Evaluations Team (2017) Clinical review: skin barrier film. NHS Business Services Authority, London. Available from (accessed 19.12.19)

Reevell G, Anders T, Morgan T (2016) Improving patients’ experience of dressing removal in practice. J Comm Nurs 30(5): 44–9

Taroc AM (2017) A guide for adhesive removal: principles, practice, and products. American Nurse Today 12(10)

Wounds UK (2018) Best Practice Statement Maintaining skin integrity. London: Wounds UK. Available from

Young T (2017) Back to basics: understanding moisture-associated skin damage. Wounds UK 13(4): 56–65

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals

By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.