Journal Articles

The language of research (part 20): understanding the quality of a qualitative paper (2)

Share this article

The language of research (part 20): understanding the quality of a qualitative paper (2)

Peter Ellis
12 March 2019

In the previous paper in this series, we looked at some of the ways in which the quality of a qualitative paper can be assessed; namely the trustworthiness, credibility, dependability, rigour, confirmability and authenticity of the research (Ellis, 2018a). We identified what these terms mean and that the sorts of rules which apply to the assessment of the quality of quantitative research, do not apply to qualitative studies: they employ very different approaches (methodologies and methods) and seek to explore very different questions. This paper examines how we can assess the quality of qualitative research, looking at some of the strategies researchers might use to demonstrate to readers that that what they have undertaken is of good quality.

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.