Made Easy: Surgical site infections in Caesarean section wounds 

Share this article

Made Easy: Surgical site infections in Caesarean section wounds 

Professor Charmaine Childs
9 April 2025
The number of babies born by caesarean section (CS) continues to rise globally. CS rates have increased significantly from 7% in 1990 to 21% in 2021 (World Health Organization [WHO], 2021). This approximates to more than 1 in 5 (21%) births and exceeds the ideal acceptable CS rate of 10%–15% (WHO, 2015; 2021). Over the next decade, global rates of CS are projected to rise further to reach 28.5% by 2030 (Ssennuni et al, 2024). However, several studies have reported CS rates over 40% (Abdelraheim et al, 2019; Rickard et al, 2020).

Within the UK, one in every fourth baby is delivered by CS (National Health Service [NHS], 2023a). Although considered to be the most common and safe surgery in women, complications are well documented (National Library of Medicine [NLM], 2024), including surgical site infection (SSI). Stryja et al (2020) define SSI as an infectious process present at the site of surgery.

Clinical signs and symptoms of wound infection include heat, redness, swelling, elevated body temperature and purulent wound exudate (International Wound Infection Institute [IWII], 2022). Despite efforts made during modern surgical procedures, SSI after CS continues to rise. A systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that SSI incidence varied between countries, the highest being in Africa and lowest in North America (Farid Mojtahedi et al, 2023). 

Risk factors and comorbidities associated with SSI in CS wounds 

Maternal obesity triples the risk of developing wound complications including SSI and associated morbidity (delayed recovery, increased discomfort and a reduced quality of life [QoL]) (Berríos-Torres et al, 2017; Dias et al, 2019). Childs et al (2020) note the growing epidemic of obesity in women of reproductive age increases the risk of SSI, in particular among morbidly obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2), in whom the SSI rate can reach 50% (Anderson et al, 2013; Yeeles et al, 2014). 

Several factors play a crucial role in SSI risk, including hypertension, duration of labour, rupture of membranes, type of anaesthesia, quality of post-operative care, early mobility and obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2); gestational diabetes and pre-existing type 1 diabetes also increase the risk of SSI (Wloch et al, 2012; Childs et al, 2020; Gomaa et al, 2021; Erritty et al, 2023). In a study of 1,682 women who received either elective or emergency CS, raised BMI (≥35 kg/m2), smoking history and emergency CS were found to be independent risk factors for post-CS SSI (Erritty et al, 2023). Stress, nutritional status, certain medications and alcoholism potentially slow the speed of healing of a CS wound (NLM, 2023; NHS, 2025).

SSI can lead to a significant cost burden for healthcare systems (Childs et al, 2020; Angolile et al, 2023), as well as maternal and family distress, problems with bonding and slow recovery for the mother (Childs et al, 2020). If the surgical wound becomes infected, there are increased demands on NHS resources (e.g. higher workload for general practitioners [GPs] and midwives, and increased district nurse visits), for medication (e.g. antibiotics and pain management) and increased dressing changes (Childs et al, 2020; Stanirowski et al, 2016).

For some patients, re-admission for surgical revision and management of the wound may be necessary. In addition to the emotional and physical pain for the mother, an infected CS wound leads to an estimated 4 days of hospitalisation and an additional cost of £3,173 per patient (Stanirowski et al, 2016). Proactive SSI prevention, based on patient risk identification, should be an integral part of pre-, intra- and post-operative CS wound care.

Pre-operative management
There is significant evidence for the use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents to prevent SSIs in CS wounds (Childs et al, 2020). Measures to prevent SSIs include nasal decolonisation, effective skin preparation using an antiseptic preparation and management of co-morbidities. Hair removal (using clippers) should only be undertaken to facilitate surgery or for applying adhesive dressings (Mangram et al, 1999; Tanner et al, 2011; Tanner and Melen, 2021). Dhamnaskar et al (2022) suggest that pre-surgical hair-shaving should be avoided in people undergoing clean-contaminated surgery or a surgery lasting less than 2 hours; this may reduce the risk of SSIs in these patient groups.

Before surgery, preparing the skin with antiseptic agents has been shown to reduce risk of infections (Al Maqbali, 2013). Contamination with Staphylococcus aureus – the source of approximately 40% of all SSIs in CS wounds – can be reduced with the use of a body wash (Wloch et al, 2012; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE], 2024). 

Evidence supports the effectiveness of pre-operative decontamination with octenidine-based antimicrobial products: Jeans et al (2018) reported a 3-fold reduction in methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection rate after employing a 5-day decontamination routine with octenisan® wash lotion – this is a mild and gentle cleanser, suitable for all skin and hair types, and provides a soap-free alternative, with a neutral skin pH value. It can be used for decontamination of skin prior to hospital admission for CS or, in the case of emergency CS, can be used immediately before transfer to theatre. Post-surgery, it can be used for whole-body washing providing the lotion is used on intact skin only. For cleansing of wounds, including infected wounds, octenilin® irrigation solution can be used. 

For immobile patients, or those with limited mobility, octenisan® wash mitts can be used for post-operative cleansing and decontamination. They are ideal for cleansing and decontaminating between skin folds.

Intra-operative precautions
Intra-operatively, local and national guidance to prevent SSI should be adhered to (De Simone et al, 2020): 

  • Skin-cleansing protocols aligned with local guidelines
  • Hair removal using clippers (if considered necessary)
  • Ensuring intra-operative normothermia 
  • Antimicrobial prophylaxis and administration (if needed)
  • Sterile instruments 
  • Timely primary incision closure. 

Post-operative management
Within the UK, many women are discharged to community care approximately 24 hours post-CS (Childs et al, 2020). Any suspected SSI  in the community will require care from the GP, community midwives and nurses. If infection is suspected based on clinical signs and symptoms, antibiotics are prescribed, but in an era of antibiotic resistance, every effort needs to be made to offset antibiotic prescribing unless clearly indicated (Childs et al, 2019). 

Practical tips for preventing SSI in CS wounds

Antimicrobials in acute care
From pre-surgery skin decontamination to post-discharge wound care, optimal prevention and decolonisation along the patient journey can help reduce the risk of SSI and improve healing outcomes (Calderwood et al, 2023). 

Antimicrobials in community care
Since most women are discharged to the community settings within 24-48 hours (NHS, 2023b), it is important for clinicians to proactively plan for CS wound care in community settings. This will ensure early identification of a suspected SSI and early appropriate interventions.

A 12-month evaluation of octenidine-containing wash mitts and their effect on preventing SSIs demonstrated a reduction in the prescribing of antibiotics, improvements in the patients’ QoL (as patients were able to use them if they were unable to shower or bathe) and no report of Pseudomonas infections (Dhoonmoon and Dyer, 2020). 

Using octenidine-containing products in practice 

Octenidine-containing products are antimicrobial solutions used for cleansing; they are an antiseptic with a low risk of antimicrobial resistance (Kramer et al, 2018; Haesler, 2020).
Figure 1 provides an algorithm on practical tips for wound cleansing, depicting how this product range can be used in routine clinical practice. 

Clinicians have numerous wound dressings available. It is important to ensure dressing choice is evidence-based. WHO guidelines for SSI prevention emphasise the importance of ‘not using any type of advanced dressing over a standard dressing on primarily closed surgical wounds for the purpose of preventing SSI’ (WHO, 2016). 

Appropriate dressings should be individualised based on patient needs (e.g. the healing stage and risk factors; Childs et al, 2020). Appropriate individual assessment of each patient is key to ensure that optimal healing can be achieved. To ensure care continuity when the patient is moved to community from hospital, a well-documented care plan should be in place to ensure shared, optimal care (Childs et al, 2020). 

Wound dressing choices for CS wounds
A dressing appropriate for CS wounds performs the following functions (Childs et al, 2020): 

  • Protection of the incision 
  • Prevention of contamination 
  • Provision of both a healing environment and patient comfort.

Determining risk for SSI prevention in CS wounds

In combination with the pre-, intra- and post-operative SSI prevention measures, the suggested pathway shown in Figure 2 provides practical tips for clinicians to adapt their SSI prevention approach.

Disclaimer: This document is supported by Schülke
References

Abdelraheim AR, Gomaa K, Ibrahim EM et al (2019) Intra-abdominal infection (IAI) following cesarean section: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral hospital in Egypt. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1): 234

Al Maqbali MA (2013) Preoperative antiseptic skin preparations and reducing SSI. Br J Nurs 22(21): 1227-33

Anderson V, Chaboyer W, Gillespie B (2013) The relationship between obesity and surgical site infections in women undergoing caesarean sections: an integrative review. Midwifery 29(12): 1331-38

Angolile CM, Max BL, Mushemba J et al (2023) Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: a call to action. Health Sci Rep 6(5): e1274

Assadian O (2016) Octenidine dihydrochloride: chemical characteristics and antimicrobial properties. J Wound Care 25(3 Suppl): S3-6

Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW et al (2017) Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg 152: 784-91

Calderwood MS, Anderson DJ, Bratzler DW et al (2023) Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 44(5): 695-720

Childs C, Wright N, Willmott J et al (2019) The surgical wound in infrared: thermographic profiles and early stage test-accuracy to predict surgical site infection in obese women during the first 30 days after caesarean section. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 8:7

Childs C, Sandy-Hodgetts K, Broad C et al (2020) Risk, prevention and management of complications after vaginal and caesarean section birth. J Wound Care 29(Sup11a): S1-48

De Simone B, Sartelli M, Coccolini F (2020) Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 15(1): 10

Dhamnaskar S, Mandal S, Koranne M et al (2022) Preoperative Surgical Site Hair Removal for Elective Abdominal Surgery: Does It Have Impact on Surgical Site Infection. Surg J (N Y) 8(3): e179-86

Dhoonmoon L, Dyer M (2020) Improving leg ulcer care in the community. J Comm Nurs 34(6): 40

Dias M, Dick A, Reynolds RM, Lahti-Pulkkinen M et al (2019) Predictors of surgical site skin infection and clinical outcome at caesarean section in the very severely obese: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 14: e0216157

Erritty M, Hale J, Thomas J et al (2023) Evaluation of independent risk factors associated with surgical site infections from caesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308(6): 1775-83

Farid Mojtahedi M, Sepidarkish M, Almukhtar M et al (2023) Global incidence of surgical site infections following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 139: 82-92

Gomaa K, Abdelraheim AR, El Gelany S et al (2021) Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five year retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21(1): 634

Haesler E (2020) Evidence Summary: Octenidine for chronic wounds. Wound Prac Res 28(1): 42-4

International Wound Infection Institute (IWII) Wound Infection in Clinical Practice. Wounds International. 2022

Jeans E, Holleyman R, Tate D et al (2018) Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonisation in elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Infect 77(5): 405-9

Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S et al (2018) Consensus on Wound Antisepsis: Update 2018. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 31(1): 28-58

Matiasek J, Kienzl P, Unger LW et al (2018) An intra-individual surgical wound comparison shows that octenidine-based hydrogel wound dressing ameliorates scar appearance following abdominoplasty. Int Wound J 15(6): 914-20

Malanovic N, Ön A, Pabst G et al (2020) Octenidine: novel insights into the detailed killing mechanism of Gram-negative bacteria at a cellular and molecular level. Int J Antimicrob Agents 56(5): 106146

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Am J Infect Control 27(2): 97-134

National Health Service (2023a) Caesarean Sections. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/caesarean-section/ (accessed 21.02.2025)                                  

National Health Service (2023b) Recovery – Caesarean Sections. Available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/caesarean-section/recovery/#:~:text=Most%20women%20can%20leave%20hospital,baby%20and%20can%20start%20breastfeeding (accessed 01.04.2025)

National Health Service (2025) Caring for your wound after having a caesarean section. Available at: https://www.mkuh.nhs.uk/patient-information-leaflet/caring-for-your-wound-after-having-a-caesarean-section (accessed 24.02.2025)

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2024) Caesarean birth. NG192. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192/chapter/Recommendations#planned-caesarean-birth (accessed 21.02.2025)

National Library of Medicine (2023) Impaired wound healing. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482254/ (accessed 21.02.2025)

National Library of Medicine (2024) Caesarean Delivery. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546707/ (accessed 01.04.2025)

Rickard J, Beilman G, Forrester J et al (2020) Surgical Infections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Global Assessment of the Burden and Management Needs. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 21(6): 478-94

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L et al (2018) Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 392: 1349-57

Spencer C, Orr D, Hallam S et al (2013) Daily bathing with octenidine on an intensive care unit is associated with a lower carriage rate of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect 83(2): 156-9

Ssennuni E, Bongomin F, Akuma E et al (2024) Caesarean section rates in a tertiary teaching hospital in northern Uganda: a retrospective analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24(1): 489

Stanirowski PJ, Bizoń M, Cendrowski K et al (2016) Randomized controlled trial evaluating dialkylcarbamoyl chloride impregnated dressings for the prevention of surgical site infections in adult women undergoing cesarean section. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 17(4): 427-35

Stryja J, Sandy-Hodgetts K, Collier M (2020) Surgical site infection: prevention and management across health-care sectors. J Wound Care 29(Sup2b): S1-72

Sway A, Nthumba P, Solomkin J et al (2019) Burden of surgical site infection following cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review. Int J Womens Health 11: 309-18

Tanner J, Norrie P, Melen K (2011) Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9(11): CD004122

Tanner J, Melen K (2021) Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8): CD004122

World Health Organization (2015) WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-15.02 (accessed 01.04.2025)

World Health Organization (2016) Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/250680/9789241549882-eng.pdf (accessed 21.02.2025)

World Health Organization (2021a) Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access (accessed 28.02.2025)

Yeeles H, Trinick S, Childs C et al (2014) Postpartum infection in morbidly obese women after caesarean section: does early prophylactic oral antibiotic use make a difference? Open J Obst Gyn 4: 547-9

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.