Made Easy: Periwound Maceration

Share this article

Made Easy: Periwound Maceration

Kim Whitlock, Julie Bateman-Limmer, Lawrance Salter
5 September 2025
The significance of the periwound in healing should not be overlooked (Rippon et al, 2022). The skin surrounding a wound is influenced by systemic, holistic and local variables and is especially susceptible to damage in exuding wounds (LeBlanc et al, 2021). The aim of this Made Easy is to provide clinicians with a greater understanding of the wound edge and discuss how optimum periwound skin management can support wound healing.

The production of exudate is vital for wound healing; however, where high levels of exudate are present, or if poorly managed, damage to the periwound area can occur (WUWHS, 2019). Hyper-hydration and prolonged exposure to wound exudate can result in maceration [Box 1]. This maceration can increase the risk of the wound enlarging (Rippon et al, 2016) or delay healing. Whilst this is frequently seen, particularly in non-healing wounds (Thomas, 1997), effective management of the periwound skin to prevent maceration has the potential to significantly improve wound healing outcomes.

Protecting the vulnerable periwound area and ensuring appropriate management of a moist wound bed should be integral to a comprehensive wound assessment and plan (Freitas, 2022). Identifying and addressing the cause of excessive exudate is essential. Maintaining a healthy periwound supports faster wound healing, lowers the risk of infection, reduces pain and discomfort, and minimises dressing changes and their associated costs (Woo et al, 2017).

What is the periwound, and why can it be easily damaged? 

The periwound area has been described in the literature as ‘the defensive zone that contains the wound’ (Dowsett et al, 2015) and is typically defined as the region within 4cm of the wound edge (Thayer et al, 2016). However, Onesti et al (2011) suggest that, in the case of  ‘difficult wounds’, this area may extend up to 10cm. The area surrounding a wound is highly susceptible to injury, making periwound complications common. The extent of epithelial cell damage can vary significantly (Bianchi, 2012). The primary causes and key characteristics are highlighted in Table 1.

Woo et al (2017) conducted a large scoping review on the management of moisture-associated skin damage and reported that periwound skin damage is common but not well-documented. This lack of documentation makes it challenging to determine its exact prevalence. However, the impact of damage to the periwound skin is significant, as periwound skin damage can impair keratinocyte migration, delaying overall wound healing (Woo et al, 2017).

Price et al (2008), in a large international survey of patients with chronic wounds, reported that 25% experienced pain around the wound. This pain was likely attributed to damaged skin in the periwound area and heightened inflammation.

Whilst maceration is often thought of as pallor or whitening of the skin, it can present differently in different individuals. Skin assessment should incorporate the patient’s skin tone and any changes in the skin that may have occurred due to ageing or lifestyle. A baseline assessment of the periwound skin tone needs to be taken upon first assessment of the wound, as well as assessment of the temperature and feel of the surrounding skin (Dhoonmoon et al, 2023). This can be compared to similar areas of skin to gain an understanding of the condition of the wound edge and whether periwound skin damage is present.  

The issue of periwound maceration 

Maceration refers to the softening and breakdown of the skin, resulting from prolonged exposure to moisture [Figure 1a–c]. Various bodily fluids, such as urine, faeces, sweat and exudate, can increase the risk of tissue damage (Hampton and Stephen-Haynes, 2005). A study by Haryanto et al (2017) found that healing was significantly delayed in wounds with macerated edges, and that maceration contributes to wound pain and discomfort. 

Excessive exposure to exudate can damage keratinocytes (that form the outermost layer of the skin, see Figure 2). These cells originate in the stratum basale (the deepest layer of the skin) and, as they migrate toward the surface, they fill with keratin, a protein that helps to maintain the skin’s waterproof barrier. The stratum corneum is the outermost layer of the skin, where cells are tightly packed to create a robust protective barrier. Approximately every 4 weeks, old skin cells are shed and replaced by new ones (Wounds UK, 2022).

Macerated skin and healthy skin: how do they differ?

The skin is mildly acidic with a surface pH between 4 and 6 (Wound Care People, 2025). Non-healing wounds tend to have a more alkaline pH.  Whilst wound exudate is essential for healing, too much can be detrimental to the wound bed and the periwound area [Box 2]. In non-healing wounds, the formation of biofilm can stimulate an inflammatory response, which increases exudate volume and the potential for skin damage (Wounds UK, 2022).

When the skin is exposed to too much exudate, the cells start to swell and lose their protective mechanism. The cells are connected by desmosomes, which break down allowing exudate and bacteria to seep between them. Skin integrity reduces and the risk of infection increases. Maceration occurs initially; however, the alkaline pH of exudate and the presence of proteolytic enzymes weakens the cells, meaning they are more likely to be shed early (Wounds UK, 2022) and there is potential for the dermis below to be exposed.  

Management strategies for periwound maceration

Although periwound skin damage is common, its management can sometimes be overlooked. Understanding and addressing underlying pathology and causes of exudate production are vital, along with assessment of the periwound skin. Clinicians must ensure safe, evidence-based practice, which incorporates periwound assessment and ensures pathways for exudate management are followed (Woo et al, 2017; Freitas, 2022). Educating clinicians about periwound management is essential to promoting best practices and improving patient outcomes.

Correct management of periwound skin is multifaceted; wound cleansing, dressing selection and good skin care form the basis of successful exudate control (Freitas, 2022). Optimising the surrounding skin gives it every chance of migrating across the wound surface enabling healing to occur. Table 2 outlines the important steps and considerations in holistic management of an exuding wound; Table 3 outlines a two-pronged approach to wound care, emphasising the dual goals of protecting vulnerable periwound skin and optimising the wound bed.

It is essential to address challenges in the wound bed whilst optimising good skin care. Wound hygiene denotes the importance of effective cleansing of the wound bed and removal of debris at the wound edge. Murphy et al (2022) suggests use of an antibacterial cleanser and vigorous rubbing of the wound allows for removal of biofilm, whilst refashioning of the wound edge can stimulate epithelialisation.  Nonetheless, the wound edge is likely to be susceptible to damage where the presence of biofilm has resulted in high exudate production and, therefore, requires protection rather than refashioning. The approach in Table 3 aims to improve the condition of the wound edge, reduce unnecessary trauma and stimulate epithelialisation. 

Medi-Derma range in practice

The Medi Derma-PRO range [Table 4] offers a complete, cost-effective treatment strategy against damage to the periwound skin, which:

  • Is suitable for use on both intact and damaged skin (Dykes et al, 2012)
  • Prevents exudate damage and maceration (Dykes et al, 2012; Bianchi et al, 2013)
  • Leads to reduced wound healing time
  • Improves clinical outcomes in lower limb ulcer management (Rogers and Watret, 2003). 
  • The range incorporates solutions to:
  • Cleanse the wound and surrounding area (Medi Derma-PRO Incontinence Cleanser)
  • Prevent damage to the periwound area (Medi Derma-S Total Barrier Cream)
  • Protect skin with mild or moderate periwound damage (Medi Derma-S Barrier Film Wipe/Spray)
  • Repair and restore skin with moderate to severe periwound damage (Medi Derma-S Barrier Film Application or Medi Derma-PRO Skin Protectant Ointment).

Conclusion

Management of the periwound in wound care is often overlooked, despite its crucial role in wound healing. Maceration of the periwound can significantly delay the healing process, increase the risk of infection, and exacerbate patient discomfort. However, these challenges can be addressed by emphasising the importance of maintaining periwound skin integrity, ultimately improving outcomes and the quality of life for patients with hard-to-heal wounds.

Evidence highlights the importance of a proactive approach that prioritises prevention, early identification, and effective management of periwound skin complications, including cleansing, debridement, and optimisation of the wound environment. Wound care should aim to prevent damage, protect the periwound area, and restore its integrity when necessary. By incorporating periwound assessment into routine wound care practices, healthcare providers can adopt a more comprehensive, patient-centred approach to wound management.

The ongoing advancement of evidence-based practices and the development of innovative wound care technologies offers promise for improved outcomes. However, further research is vital to strengthen the evidence base and deepen understanding of how periwound damage influences wound healing and clinical outcomes. Such research can provide a robust framework for clinical recommendations, education, and industry innovation, ultimately optimising periwound care.

Disclaimer: This document has been supported by an educational grant from Medicareplus International
References

Bianchi J (2012) Protecting the integrity of the periwound skin. Wound Essentials 1: 58–64

Bianchi J, Beldon P, Callaghan R, Stephen-Haynes J (2013) Barrier products: Effective use of a barrier cream and film. Wounds UK 9(1): 82–8

Dhoonmoon L, Nair HKR, Abbas Z et al (2023) International Consensus Document: Wound care and skin tone signs, symptoms and terminology for all skin tones. Wounds International

Dowsett C, Nyløkke Gronemann M, Harding K (2015) Taking wound assessment beyond the edge. Wounds International 6(1): 19–23

Dykes P, Goodwin R, Rosslee V (2012) Pilot study into the efficacy of film barrier skin care products. Wounds UK 8(4): 144–147

Freitas A (2022) Periwound maceration skin management strategies using a skin barrier film on diabetic foot ulcers. The Diabetic Foot Journal 25(3): 34–41

Hampton S, Stephen-Haynes JAJ (2005) Skin maceration: assessment, preventionand treatment. In: White RJ, ed. Skin Care in Wound Management: Assessment, Prevention and Treatment. Wounds UK, Aberdeen: 87–106

Haryanto H, Arisandi D, Suriadi S et al (2017) Relationship between maceration and wound healing on diabetic foot ulcers in Indonesia: a prospective study. Int Wound J 14(3): 516–22

Holloway S, Mahoney K (2020) Perwound skin care: considerations for older adults. Practice Nursing 31(8): 326–333

LeBlanc K, Beeckman D, Campbell K et al (2021) Best practice recommendations for prevention and management of periwound skin complications. Wounds International

Murphy C, Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B, Kuberka I et al (2022) Implementation of Wound Hygiene in clinical practice: early use of an antibiofilm strategy promotes positive patient outcomes. J Wound Care 31(Sup1): S1–S32

Onesti MG, Fioramonti P, Carella S, Maruccia M (2011) L’importanza della cute perilesionale nel trattamento delle ferite difficili [The importance of periwound skin in the treatment of “difficult wound”]. G Chir 32(1-2): 83-8

Price PE, Fagervik-Morton H, Mudge EJ et al (2008) Dressing-related pain in patients with chronic wounds: an international patient perspective. Int Wound J 5(2): 159-71

Rippon MG, Rogers AA, Ousey K et al (2022) The importance of periwound skin in wound healing: an overview of the evidence. J Wound Care 31(8): 648–659

Rippon MG, Ousey K, Cutting KF (2016) Wound healing and hyper-hydration: a counterintuitive model. J Wound Care 25(2): 68, 70–5

Rogers A, Watret L (2003) Maceration and its effect on periwound margins. Diabet Foot 6(3): S2

Thayer DM, Rozenboom B, Baranoski S (2016) “Top-down” skin injuries: Prevention and management of moisture-associated skin damage, medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI) and skin tears. In: Doughty D and McNichol LL (Eds.). Wound Management. Philadelphia, PA Wolters Kluwer. p283

Thomas S (1997) Assessment and management of wound exudate. J Wound Care 6(7): 327–30

Woo KY, Beeckman D, Chakravarthy D (2017) Management of moisture-associated skin damage: A scoping review. Adv Skin Wound Care 30(11): 494–501

Wounds UK (2022) Quick Guide: Periwound Maceration. Wounds UK

World Union of Wound Healing Societies (2019) Wound exudate: Effective assessment and management. Wounds International

Wound Care People (2025) Skin pH and barrier function. Available at: https://www.ucc-today.com/journals/issue/launch-edition/article/skin-ph-and-barrier-function (accessed 16.05.2025)

Young T (2017) Back to basics: understanding moisture-associated skin damage. Wounds UK 13(2): 56–65

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Share this article

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.