Journal Articles

Understanding the quality of a quantitative paper (5): bias

Share this article

Understanding the quality of a quantitative paper (5): bias

Peter Ellis
7 September 2022

In the last paper in this series we considered how one might assess the quality of quantitative research with reference to a randomised controlled trial (RCT; Ellis, 2022a). We considered the use of blinding, or masking, and how this can be used to hide from the participant, research team, or both, whether the participant is being given the active treatment or the treatment against which this is being tested — the control.

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.