Journal Articles

Spending time to categorise and report pressure ulcers and moisture-associated skin damage — is it worth it?

Share this article

Spending time to categorise and report pressure ulcers and moisture-associated skin damage — is it worth it?

Elaine Bethell, Elizabeth Nichols, Gill Hiskett, Jenni Macdonald, Louise Morris
6 March 2020

This debate focuses on the complexities of categorising and reporting pressure ulcers (PUs) and moisture-associated skin damage (MASD), which are frequent topics of discussions among the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) community (Ousey et al, 2017; Fletcher, 2019). In recent years, great efforts have been made to assess the extent of patient harm and demonstrate improvement, in particular, PUs occurrence and severity. Efforts to improve the quality of care led to the development of a number of data collection systems and quality metrics, including the NHS Safety Thermometer (NHS, 2011), where NHS organisations in England input their prevalence data (of categories 2–4 PUs) on one given day each month, and the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) (NHS Improvement, 2019), where new PU incidents are recorded continuously based on the degree of harm they cause.

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.