Implementation of a validated non-healing wounds pathway in practice: learning from UK healthcare settings

Share this article

Implementation of a validated non-healing wounds pathway in practice: learning from UK healthcare settings

Jacqui Fletcher, Rosie Callaghan, Claire Checkley, Jacqueline Dark, Donna Essex, Bernadette McGlynn, Holly Pollock, David Taylor, Joanne Towill
28 May 2025

Non-healing wounds are a significant burden on patients, clinicians and healthcare systems worldwide. Although it is hard to estimate the exact cost of care for non-healing wounds, overall wound care estimates reach several billion pounds per year in developed countries (Queen and Harding, 2023). For the National
Health Service (NHS), the majority of wound care costs – one of the top health expenditures of the NHS – are attributed to non-healing wounds in the UK population (Guest et al, 2020). This situation is only going to get worse as prevalence trends have shown a 71% increase in non-healing wounds from 2012/2013 to 2017/2018 (Guest et al, 2020).

Not only is there a need in the UK to accurately predict the future population needs for wound care, but it is also crucial to proactively and urgently tackle the projected rise in costs. Equally important is the need to enhance the patient experience, improve patients’ quality of life (QoL), and support the health and wellbeing of frontline staff delivering care to this growing population. A comprehensive approach that focuses on improved outcomes and financial sustainability, alongside the wellbeing of both patients and healthcare professionals, is
essential for ensuring high-quality, effective and safe wound care services.

PICO™ single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) for non-healing wounds provides an opportunity to achieve improved outcomes and long-term cost-effectiveness (Kirsner et al, 2019; 2020; Dowsett et al,
2022). With a proven clinical efficacy over traditional NPWT (tNPWT), PICO™ sNPWT can help clinicians achieve better outcomes for their patients and reallocate crucial resources where most needed (Kirsner et al, 2019; 2020; Dowsett et al, 2022).

The PICO™ sNPWT pathway for nonhealing wounds has been validated across a previously reported cohort of 323 patients (Hampton et al, 2022). Measuring further outcomes across different wound aetiologies continues in the UK. The implementation of the PICO™ sNPWT pathway was presented in a Best Practice Statement document (BPS) released in 2022 (Dowsett et al, 2022). This current BPS is an evolution of that story of implementation. It is important to highlight that Jacqueline Dark and her team were instrumental in the launch of the 2022 BPS, and this statement stands true for this current document also. The evolution of these two BPS documents highlights the often-overlooked area of how clinicians can use a BPS to align to evidence-based clinical practice. This alignment can help achieve positive outcomes when a validated pathway, alongside robust data collection, is implemented across local populations of non-healing wound patients.

The objective of this publication is to share experiences and learnings from the PICO™ sNPWT roll-out and provide actionable insights. It shows the positive outcomes achieved and the practical lessons learned across the UK after implementation of the PICO™ sNPWT pathway. Therefore, clinicians can use this current BPS to align their clinical practices to this validated pathway for non-healing wounds. This BPS document summarises major outcomes, setting-specific challenges, and potential solutions. It also provides practical tips and notable patient experiences that reinforce best practice for the management of non-healing wounds.

This document does not provide conceptual background on sNPWT, except a brief introduction. For that purpose, references to relevant literature are provided throughout. It is not possible to overstate the importance of early identification and intervention for achieving optimal outcomes for people with non-healing wounds. This BPS document underlines this message.

Jacqui Fletcher OBE, Chair

Download the PDF below to access the full Best Practice Statement

Disclaimer: This resource has been developed by Wounds UK and is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Smith+Nephew.
References

Carter MJ, DaVanzo J, Haught R et al (2023) Chronic wound prevalence and the associated cost of treatment in Medicare beneficiaries: Changes between 2014 and 2019. J Med Econ 26(1): 894–901

Cullen B, Gefen A (2023) The biological and physiological impact of the performance of wound dressings. Int Wound J 20(4): 1292–1303

Dowsett C, Hampton J, Myers D et al (2017) Use of PICO™ to improve clinical and economic outcomes in hard-to-heal wounds. Wounds International 8(2): 52–8

Dowsett C, Milne J, Sharpe A (2023) Active treatment of non-healing wounds in the community: Why language matters. Wounds UK 19(1): 64–7

Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P (2020) Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ Open 10: e045253

Hampton J, Meagher H, Sharpe A et al (2022) Multi-centre, international practice-based evidence using PICO™ single-use negative pressure wound therapy: challenging current behaviours in wound care practice. Wounds International 13(2): 46–53

Hughes J, Costello M, Belshaw M et al (2021) The burden of dehisced wounds in the community: using early results from a multi-centre service evaluation to propose a standard of care to improve patient outcomes and safeguard woundcare budgets. Br J Healthcare Management 27: 16–25

Järbrink K, Ni G, Sönnergren H et al (2017) The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 6(1): 15

Jørgensen LB, Sørensen JA, Jemec GB et al (2015) Methods to assess area and volume of wounds –
a systematic review. Int Wound J 13(4): 540–53

Kirsner R, Dove C, Reyzelman A et al (2019) A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system, compared to traditional negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremities. Wound Repair Regen 27(5): 519–29

Kirsner RS, Delhougne G, Searle RJ (2020) Effectiveness analysis comparing single-use and traditional negative pressure wound therapy to treat chronic venous and diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Manag Prev 66(3): 30–8

Legs Matter (2023) The cost of care. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/583jn9xh (accessed 01.10.2025)

McCluskey P, Brennan K, Mullan J et al (2020) Impact of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system on healing. JCN 34: 36–43

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019) PICO™ negative pressure wound dressings for closed surgical incisions. MTG43. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg43 (accessed 01.10.2025)

National Library of Medicine (2022) Chronic wounds: Learn More – What are the treatment options for chronic wounds? Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326436/ (accessed 01.10.2025)

National Library of Medicine (2023) Negative pressure wound therapy. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576388/#:~:text=Negative%20pressure%20wound%20therapy%20(NPWT,exudate%20and%20promote%20granulation%20tissue (accessed 01.10.2025)

Queen D, Harding K (2023) What’s the true costs of wounds faced by different healthcare systems around the world? Int Wound J 20(10): 3935–38

Sen CK (2023) Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2022 Compendium of Estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 12(12): 657–70

Smith+Nephew (2020) Evidence in focus Compendium of evidence, September 2020. Available at: https://smith-nephew.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/0a77f678d1044525bb6606e858efe6e2?v=8fe4cfef (accessed 01.10.2025)

The King’s Fund (2024) Staff shortages. Available at: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/staff-shortages
(accessed 24.02.2025)

World Union of Wound Healing Societies (2019) Wound exudate: effective assessment and management. Wounds International

Wounds UK (2022) Best Practice Statement: Active treatment of non-healing wounds in the community. Wounds UK, London. Available to download from: www.wounds-uk.com